Thomson Reuters Challenges AI Company’s Fair Use Appeal

By Editorial Team

Thomson Reuters is urging the Third Circuit to uphold a district court ruling that an artificial intelligence (AI) legal search engine’s use of Westlaw headnotes did not constitute fair use. The company claims that the AI firm “pilfered” copyrighted content to create a competing business.

The legal battle between Thomson Reuters and the AI company has escalated, with Thomson Reuters seeking legal recourse to protect its copyrighted material. The AI company’s use of Westlaw headnotes has raised concerns about intellectual property rights and fair use in the legal tech industry.

Thomson Reuters is represented by law firms Kirkland & Ellis, Pillsbury Winthrop, and White & Case in this case. On the other hand, the AI company is represented by its legal counsel as the dispute unfolds in court.

The case has attracted attention from legal experts and industry stakeholders, as it could set a precedent for how AI companies can use copyrighted legal content in their products. The outcome of this legal battle may have far-reaching implications for the AI and legal tech sectors.

As the legal proceedings continue, both parties are gearing up for a rigorous legal battle to defend their positions. The Third Circuit’s decision on the fair use appeal will be closely watched by the legal community for its potential impact on copyright law and AI technology.