Supreme Court Makes Three Years’ Legal Practice Mandatory to Apply for Judicial Service

By Editorial Team

The Supreme Court of India has recently ruled that aspiring candidates must have a minimum of three years of legal practice to be eligible to apply for judicial services. This decision aims to ensure that individuals applying for judicial positions have substantial legal experience before taking on such crucial roles within the justice system.

The ruling was made in response to a petition challenging the eligibility criteria for judicial service exams. The petition argued that the current requirement of seven years of practice as an advocate was too high and prevented many competent individuals from applying for judicial positions.

After considering the arguments presented, the Supreme Court revised the eligibility criteria to three years of legal practice. This decision is expected to open up opportunities for a larger pool of candidates with diverse legal backgrounds to enter the judiciary.

The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of ensuring that candidates have a strong foundation in legal practice to effectively carry out their duties as judges. By reducing the minimum years of practice required, the court aims to strike a balance between experience and accessibility to judicial positions.

Legal experts have welcomed this decision, stating that it will encourage more young and talented lawyers to consider a career in the judiciary. The move is seen as a positive step towards enhancing the quality and diversity of the judicial system in India.

Aspiring candidates who meet the new eligibility criteria of three years’ legal practice can now apply for judicial service exams and pursue a career in the judiciary. The Supreme Court’s decision is expected to have a significant impact on the recruitment process for judicial positions across the country.