Sandisk Points To Differences In ‘Settled Expectations’ Cases

By Editorial Team

Sandisk Technologies Inc. has presented arguments to the Federal Circuit, asserting that its case challenging the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s denial of patent reviews based on an owner’s “settled expectations” is distinct from recent cases where petitions were rejected due to changing institution practices at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

The company’s stance was outlined in a recent court filing, highlighting the unique aspects of its situation compared to other similar cases. Sandisk’s legal representatives emphasized the specific circumstances and legal principles at play in their dispute with the USPTO.

Legal experts are closely monitoring this case, as it could have implications for future patent review processes and the application of “settled expectations” in such proceedings. The Federal Circuit’s eventual ruling on this matter may provide clarity on how this legal concept applies in the context of patent disputes.

For more legal news and analysis, subscribe to Law360 for comprehensive coverage of the latest developments in various practice areas and industries.