World Litigation Forum is now  “World Lawyers Forum.”

23rd WLF, Jan 19-20, 2026, Dubai – 22°C 🌤️
20th WLF, April 28 – 29, 2025, Bahrain – 28°C ☀️

21st WLF, September 24 – 25, 2025, Amsterdam – 16°C🌤️

22nd WLF, Jan 2026, Dubai, UAE – 22°C 🌤️

Anthropic Judge Rejects Bid For ‘Sweeter’ Part Of $1.5B Deal

Anthropic Judge Rejects Bid For ‘Sweeter’ Part Of $1.5B Deal

By Editorial Team

A California federal judge overseeing Anthropic’s $1.5 billion copyright settlement with authors has rebuffed a Canadian publisher’s attempt to secure a more favorable deal. The judge’s response was firm, stating that the publisher could choose to opt out but could not seek better terms than other class members.

The judge’s decision came after the publisher’s counsel reached out to the AI company seeking a more advantageous arrangement. The judge’s stance reinforces the principle of equal treatment for all class members involved in the settlement.

Anthropic’s $1.5 billion copyright settlement has been closely monitored by legal experts and industry observers. The case has attracted attention due to its significant financial implications and the complex legal issues surrounding copyright law and class action settlements.

Legal firms involved in the case include Arnold & Porter, Cooley LLP, Culpepper IP, Lieff Cabraser, Morrison & Foerster, and Susman Godfrey. The case is being heard in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, with Judge William Alsup presiding over the proceedings.

For more information on this developing story and other legal news, stay tuned to Law360 for the latest updates.

Get In Touch

Select Your Event(Required)
Name(Required)
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Share on:

Discover more from World Lawyers Forum

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading