Greenpeace is now fighting back — this time in European courts
On July 1, 2025, Greenpeace International filed anti-SLAPP proceedings in the Amsterdam District Court, arguing that Energy Transfer’s lawsuit was designed to stifle free speech and environmental advocacy. The case relies on the EU Anti-SLAPP Directive, which came into force in April 2024. This directive allows European courts to recognize and dismiss abusive foreign lawsuits and award damages to those unjustly targeted.
“This case is a textbook SLAPP,” said Mads Flarup Christensen, Executive Director of Greenpeace International. “It’s meant to punish us for standing up to fossil fuel companies and to scare others into silence. We are using every legal tool available to push back.”
If Greenpeace’s case succeeds, it could prevent the U.S. judgment from being enforced in Europe and may also compel Energy Transfer to pay damages to Greenpeace International for the harm caused by the lawsuit.
Legal analysts say the case is significant for multiple reasons. It will test the practical reach of the EU Anti-SLAPP Directive and may establish a legal precedent for European organizations targeted by foreign litigation. Moreover, it reflects growing concerns over how corporations use legal systems to intimidate activists and NGOs globally.
SLAPPs are on the rise around the world. The EU’s directive is a major step forward, but its true strength will depend on whether courts like Amsterdam’s are willing to act boldly.
Energy Transfer has not yet responded publicly to the Dutch lawsuit.
The Dakota Access Pipeline protests, which began in 2016, drew worldwide attention as Indigenous groups and environmental activists rallied to stop the project. While the pipeline was ultimately completed, the legal battles have continued, with Greenpeace remaining a prominent target.
